人工智能恐惧量表的汉化及其在本科护生中的信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,博士,讲师

通讯作者:

基金项目:

2024年常州大学教育教学研究课题(GJY2024030)


Translation and validation of the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale in undergraduate nursing students
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 汉化人工智能恐惧量表(Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale, FtAIS)并在本科护生群体中检验其信效度,为准确评估护生对人工智能的态度提供可靠工具。方法 采用Brislin翻译模式对量表进行正译、回译及跨文化调适,并经预调查形成中文版FtAIS。采用便利抽样法对375名本科护生进行问卷调查,检验量表的信效度。175名用于探索性因子分析,200名用于验证性因子分析。结果 中文版FtAIS共包含10个条目,探索性因子分析提取出“工作相关担忧”和“人性与伦理担忧”2个公因子,累计方差贡献率为78.958%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好(χ2/df=1.482,RMSEA=0.049,IFI=0.986,TLI=0.981,CFI=0.985)。中文版FtAIS整体Cronbach′s α系数为0.918,2个维度的Cronbach′s α系数分别为0.905及0.919,重测信度为0.836。量表水平内容效度指数为0.975,条目水平内容效度指数为0.875~1.000。结论 中文版FtAIS具有良好的信效度,可作为评估本科护生人工智能恐惧水平的有效工具。

    Abstract:

    Objective To translate the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (FtAIS) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity in undergraduate nursing students, and to provide a reliable tool for accurately assessing nursing students′ attitudes towards artificial intelligence. Methods Following the Brislin translation model, the scale underwent forward translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation, and a pre-survey was conducted to form the Chinese version of FtAIS. A total of 375 undergraduate nursing students were investigated by convenience sampling to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Among them, 175 samples were used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 200 samples were used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results The Chinese version of FtAIS consisted of 10 items. EFA extracted two common factors, namely work-related concerns and humanity and ethics-related concerns, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 78.958%. CFA showed that the model fitted well (χ2/df=1.482, RMSEA=0.049, IFI=0.986, TLI=0.981, CFI=0.985). The overall Cronbach′s α coefficient of the Chinese version of FtAIS was 0.918, and the Cronbach′s α coefficients of the two dimensions were 0.905 and 0.919, respectively; the test-retest reliability was 0.836. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.975, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.875 to 1.000. Conclusion The Chinese version of FtAIS demonstrates good reliability and validity and can serve as an effective tool for assessing the level of fear towards artificial intelligence among undergraduate nursing students.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张媛媛,钱嘉伟,陈伟伦,彭诗语,孙嘉怡,沈宇文,郭钰群,左馨妍,倪美琴.人工智能恐惧量表的汉化及其在本科护生中的信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2026,41(6):17-21

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-12
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-23