ICU患者替代决策者共享决策干预的范围综述
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,本科,护师

通讯作者:

基金项目:


A scoping review of shared decision-making interventions for surrogate decision-makers of ICU patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 对ICU患者替代决策者共享决策干预研究进行范围综述,明确干预要素,为开展相关研究及应用提供参考。方法 以JBI范围综述方法学为指导,系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CINAHL、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台,检索时限为建库至2024年12月20日,对纳入的文献进行汇总和分析。结果 共纳入15篇文献,包含13项随机对照试验、2项混合方法研究。9项研究以渥太华决策支持框架、认知-情绪决策理论、家庭系统理论、社会认知理论、自我效能理论、促进感知模型等为理论依据进行干预;15项研究的干预方法包括决策辅助工具、沟通促进者、多组分家庭支持措施、护士参与家庭会议及书面沟通;干预时机多为住院期间;结局指标包括心理情绪、决策结局、医疗服务质量与体验、患者结局指标等;共享决策干预可改善ICU患者替代决策者的决策结局,提升医疗服务质量与体验。结论 ICU共享决策干预研究尚处于发展阶段,其积极影响已得到初步验证。未来研究应重点关注理论框架的整合、干预时机的选择、长期干预效果的评估以及本土化实践创新等方面的拓展。

    Abstract:

    Objective To conduct a scoping review of shared decision-making (SDM) interventions for surrogate decision-makers of ICU patients, to identify core intervention components, aiming to inform future research and clinical practice. Methods Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology, a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, China Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, and Wanfang, from database inception to December 20, 2024. Study characteristics and interventions were thematically synthesized. Results Fifteen studies (13 RCTs, 2 mixed-methods studies) were included.Nine studies utilized established frameworks including Ottawa Decision Support Framework, Cognitive-Emotional Decision Theory, Family Systems Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, Self-efficacy Theory, and Sense of Coherence Model. Intervention types included decision aids, communication facilitators, multimodal family support, nurse-involved family conferences, and written communication. Interventions were mainly provided in the hospital. Outcome measures included psychological and emotional states, decision-making outcomes, quality and experience of medical services, and patient outcomes. SDM interventions improved decision-making outcomes and enhanced the quality and experience of medical services. Conclusion While the evidence base for ICU SDM interventions is still evolving, their beneficial effects have been preliminarily substantiated. Key priorities for advancing this field include:theoretical framework integration, critical time window selection for interventions, long-term efficacy evaluation, and context-specific adaptation for local practice innovation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王思淼,李君,张晓辉,徐伟,李依,杨昕怡,李育蔚,尚雪莹. ICU患者替代决策者共享决策干预的范围综述[J].护理学杂志,2025,40(16):124-129

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-26