基于健康照护视角的优逝量表编制及信效度测评
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

男,本科在读,学生

通讯作者:

基金项目:

上海市抗癌协会“护航”计划项目(SACA-HH202203);复旦大学-复星护理科研基金项目(FNF202241);复旦大学上海医学院本科生学术研究资助计划——卿枫学者项目(QF2322)


Development and psychometric testing of the Good Death Scale for Patients in China from the perspective of Health Care
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 编制符合我国社会文化特点的优逝量表,为我国患者的死亡质量测评提供科学工具。方法 以本土化优逝内涵为基本框架,通过文献回顾和质性访谈形成基于健康照护视角的优逝量表维度和条目池。通过专家函询、预调查形成测试版量表。采用方便取样法,邀请742名离世患者亲属对量表信效度进行测评。结果 探索性因子分析提取7个公因子,累积方差贡献率为63.03%;验证性因子分析构建一阶模型,χ2/df=2.353,RMSEA=0.056,IFI=0.900,GFI=0.847,NFI=0.838,CFI=0.899。总量表的Cronbach′s α系数为0.937,除躯体安适维度[Cronbach′s α系数为0.412,组合信度为0.443,平均提取方差值(AVE)为0.215]外,其他6个维度Cronbach′s α系数为0.738~0.919,组合信度为0.757~0.912,AVE为0.445~0.635。结论 优逝量表总体上具备较好的信效度,可用于测量我国患者的死亡质量,但躯体安适维度仍需进行进一步完善。

    Abstract:

    Objective To develop a questionnaire to measure the quality of death in the Chinese socio-cultural context and to provide a scientific tool for measuring the quality of death. Methods Guided by the localized concept of good death, the initial dimension structure and item pool of the Good Death Scale for Patients in China (GDS-PCN) were developed through literature review and qualitative interviews. A testing version of the GDS-PCN was formed after the Delphi survey and pilot survey. A conve-nience sample of 742 family members of the bereaved patients were invited to test the psychometric characteristics of the GDS-PCN. Results Seven common factors were identified by exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 63.03%. A first-order model was constructed using confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df=2.353,RMSEA=0.056,IFI=0.900,GFI=0.847,NFI=0.838,CFI=0.899). The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the GDS-PCN was 0.937. Except for the dimension of physical wellbeing[Cronbach′s α =0.412,composition reliability=0.443,average variance extracted (AVE) value=0.215], the other 6 dimensions enjoyed good reliability (Cronbach′s α coefficient ranging from 0.738 to 0.919, composition reliability coefficient from 0.757 to 0.912, and AVE values from 0.445 to 0.635). Conclusion In general, the reliability and validity of the GDS-PCN was good. It could be used to evaluate the quality of death of patients in China. Yet, future effort is needed to develop the dimension of the physical wellbeing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

肖凯峰,刘培豪,闵家伟,来小彬.基于健康照护视角的优逝量表编制及信效度测评[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(4):102-107

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-17
  • 最后修改日期:2023-11-27
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-03