不同筛查工具对脑卒中后误吸筛查准确性的网状Meta分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士在读,学生

通讯作者:

基金项目:

江苏高校优势学科建设工程三期项目(苏政办发〔2018〕87 号);江苏省老年医学学会2019年度老年医学科技发展基金(医养结合)专项项目(JGS2019ZXYY010)


Screening accuracy for aspiration in patients with stroke using different screening instruments:a network meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 采用网状Meta分析方法评价常用误吸筛查工具的筛查价值。方法 计算机检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,搜集建库至2020年3月脑卒中后床边筛查工具筛查误吸的研究。由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和文献质量评价,采用Stata 15.0软件分析数据。结果 共纳入27篇文献,包含2 797例患者,涉及4种筛查工具。累积排序概率曲线下面积结果显示,灵敏度由高到低的筛查工具依次为Gugging吞咽功能评估量表、容积黏度吞咽测试、进食评估问卷调查工具-10、洼田饮水试验;特异度由高到低为洼田饮水试验、Gugging吞咽功能评估量表、进食评估问卷调查工具-10、容积黏度吞咽测试。结论 常用误吸筛查工具中Gugging吞咽功能评估量表的灵敏度较高,洼田饮水试验的特异度较高,该结论仍需大样本、高质量的研究进一步证明。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of bedside screening instruments for aspiration in patients with stroke by network meta-analysis. Methods The electronic databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and CBM were searched to collect studies on the diagnosis of aspiration by bedside screening instruments after stroke from inception to March, 2020. Two researchers independently retrieved the literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, network meta-analysis was performed by using the Stata 15.0 software. Results A total of 27 studies, involving 2 797 patients and 4 screening instruments (Water Swallow Test, Eating Assessment Tool-10,Gugging Swallowing Screen,Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test) were included. Surface under the cumulative ranking area results showed that the sensitivity of GUSS was the highest, followed by VVST, EAT-10, and WST, whereas the values of specificity were listed in descending order as follows WST>GUSS>EAT-10>VVST. Conclusion The sensitivity of GUSS and specificity of WST are relatively high for bedside screening of aspiration in stroke patients. This conclusion still needs to be further verified by large sample size and high-quality studies.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘彦麟,丁亚萍,刘世晴,陈申,赵青,余洁,熊峰.不同筛查工具对脑卒中后误吸筛查准确性的网状Meta分析[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(2):93-97

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-12
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-16