中文版决策冲突量表在直肠癌患者术式决策中应用的信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,护士

通讯作者:

基金项目:

湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会面上项目(WJ2017M064)


Reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of Decisional Conflict Scale in patients making decision for rectal cancer surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 对决策冲突量表(DecisionConflictScale,DCS)进行跨文化调适和信效度检验。方法 遵循美国矫形外科医师学会循证 医学委员会推荐指南进行问卷的翻译、回译以及跨文化调适,抽取胃肠外科250例直肠癌患者进行问卷调查,检验中文版决策冲 突量表的信效度。结果 中文版 DCS共16个条目,因子分析共提取3个公因子,累计贡献率达65.481%。量表水平的内容效度 指数为0.989;Cronbach'sα系数为0.886,各维度 Cronbach'sα系数为0.706~0.911;Guttman折半系数为0.869。结论 中文版 DCS具有良好的信效度,符合问卷心理学测量要求,适用于评估直肠癌患者的决策冲突水平。

    Abstract:

    Objective To describe the cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of Decision Conflict Scale(DCS),and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DCS. Methods The English version of DCS was translated into Chinese and cross-culturally adapted according to a standardized procedure recommended by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.The Chinese version was tested in 250 patients with rectal cancer for reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of DCS consisted of 16 items.Factor analysis extracted 3 factors,which could explain 65.481% of the total variance.The content validity index was 0.989;the Cronbach′s α coefficients of the total scale and 3 factors were 0.886, and 0.706-0.911, respectively;the Guttman-split-half reliability was 0.869. Conclusion The Chinese version of DCS has good reliability and validity,and meet the psychometric properties requirements.It can be useful for monitoring decisional conflict level of rectal cancer patients in clinical practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王露,陈英,崔金锐,方汉萍,刘洪娟,廖宗峰,胡凯利.中文版决策冲突量表在直肠癌患者术式决策中应用的信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(3):31-35

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-21
  • 最后修改日期:2018-11-24
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-09