基于奥马哈问题分类系统的第二受害者伤害评价指标构建
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

男,硕士在读,护师

通讯作者:

基金项目:

山西省科技战略研究专项一般项目(202104031402143);山西白求恩医院科研项目(2021YH01)


Construction of injury assessment indexes for second victim based on Omaha problem classification system
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 构建患者安全事件中关于第二受害者的伤害评价指标,为全面识别第二受害者伤害表现提供参考。 方法 以奥马哈问题分类系统为理论框架,在文献回顾和专题小组讨论的基础上,初步拟订评价指标的条目池;采用德尔菲法选取20名护理专家开展2轮函询,最终确定第二受害者伤害评价指标内容。 结果 2轮专家函询有效问卷回收率分别是100%、95.0%;专家权威系数分别是0.81、0.83。第2轮专家函询一级指标、二级指标、三级指标专家意见肯德尔协调系数分别为0.478,0.287,0.294(均P<0.05)。最终确定的第二受害者伤害评价指标包含一级指标4个(生理、心理、社会、经济),二级指标16个,三级指标54个。 结论 第二受害者伤害评价指标构建的理论基础科学,形成过程规范,结果可靠,可为全面识别第二受害者伤害表现,进一步开发第二受害者相关评估工具,构建有针对性的第二受害者支持方案提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Objective To construct injury assessment indexes for second victims in patient safety event, and to provide references for comprehensively identifying second victim′s injury manifestations. Methods Taking the Omaha problem classification system as the theoretical framework, the item pool of assessment indicators was preliminarily drawn up based on literature review and panel discussion.A total of 20 nursing experts were selected for 2 rounds of Delphi consultation, in an effort to determine the contents of injury assessment indexes for second victims. Results The response rates in the two rounds of expert consultations were 100% and 95% respectively; the expert authority coefficients were 0.81 and 0.83 respectively.The Kendall coordination coefficients of the second rounds of expert consultation on first-level, second-level, and third-level indicators were 0.478, 0.287, and 0.294 respectively (all P<0.05).The finalized assessment index system included 4 first-level indicators (physiological, psychological, social, economic aspects), 16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators. Conclusion The theoretical basis for the construction of the second victim injuryes assessment indexes is scientific, the formation process is standardized, and the result is reliable.The indexes can provide a reference for comprehensively identifying second victim′s injury manifestations, for further developing second victim-related assessment tools, and for construction of targeted support programs for second victims.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高志恒,张晓红,何芳,张姝,杜荣欣,陈家琦.基于奥马哈问题分类系统的第二受害者伤害评价指标构建[J].护理学杂志,2023,28(19):58-62

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-09
  • 最后修改日期:2023-07-31
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-29