Objective To evaluate health aging measurement tools and provide a reference for aging research. Methods Such databases as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, Web of Science, and PubMed, were searched to retrieve publications on healthy aging mea-surement tools.The included tools were evaluated based on Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Results A total of 14 studies totaling 14 healthy aging measurement tools were included; all studies were flawed with a certain bias and graded level B:9 studies lacked comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index and other similar indicators related to structure validity; 7 studies did not conduct multi-group factor analysis or differential item functioning analysis; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or weighted Kappa values were not reported in 12 studies;12 studies did not define hypotheses. Conclusion The measurement tools of healthy aging should be improved, and the research design and reporting should be standardized according to the quality evaluation guidelines of the measurement instruments, so as to provide the basis for selection of high-quality assessment tools to assess the level of aging more accurately.