两种镇痛方式改善静脉输液港无损伤针穿刺疼痛的效果比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,副主任护师,科护士长

通讯作者:

基金项目:

广东省护士协会科研课题(gdshsxh2021b009)


Comparison of two analgesia methods in relieving pain during non-invasive needle insertion into the totally implantable access port
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 观察Valsalva呼吸、复方利多卡因乳膏减轻输液港无损伤针穿刺疼痛感的效果。 方法 采用便利抽样法选取148例接受抗肿瘤药物治疗患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组、利多卡因组和Valsalva组,分别在无损伤针穿刺前1 h涂抹医用凡士林(安慰剂)、复方利多卡因乳膏和穿刺时采用Valsalva呼吸。观察患者穿刺疼痛程度。 结果 利多卡因组疼痛评分显著低于Valsalva组和对照组(均P<0.05)。 结论 涂抹复方利多卡因乳膏可缓解输液港无损伤针穿刺疼痛,提升患者舒适度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the effectiveness of Valsalva maneuver and compound lidocaine cream in relieving pain during non-invasive needle insertion into the totally implantable access port. Methods A total of 148 patients treated with antineoplastic drugs were conveniently enrolled, and randomized to received any of the 3 interventions for non-invasive needle insertion into the port:applying medical Vaseline as placebo (the control group) or compound lidocaine cream (the lidocaine group) 1 hour before puncture, or asking the patients to breathe with Valsalva maneuver (the Valsalva group) upon puncture.Pain scores during needle insertion were measured and compared. Results The lidocaine group had the lowest pain scores as compared with the other two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion Use of compound lidocaine cream could alleviate pain during non-invasive needle insertion into the totally implantable access port, and enhance overall comfort of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

石思梅,朱瑞云,邓波,黄旭霞,辛明珠.两种镇痛方式改善静脉输液港无损伤针穿刺疼痛的效果比较[J].护理学杂志,2023,28(7):63-66

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-05
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-29