代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与问卷的汉化及信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士在读,护士

通讯作者:

基金项目:

河南省教育厅高等学校科技创新团队支持计划项目(19IRTSTHN005);河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建项目)(2018020262);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师培养计划(2019GGJS008)


Translation and validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 汉化代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与问卷,并检验其信效度。 方法 对代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与问卷进行翻译及文化调适,形成中文版问卷。便利抽取415名社区老年慢性病患者家属,检验中文版问卷的信效度。 结果 中文版问卷条目水平的内容效度指数为0.830~1.000,问卷水平的内容效度指数为0.970;探索性因子分析形成代理决策角色认知、思考、自我效能、准备度4个因子,累积方差贡献率为83.906%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合指数为χ2/df=2.307、CFI=0.949、GFI=0.880、NFI=0.913、IFI=0.949、TLI=0.937、RMSEA=0.078。问卷总体Cronbach′s α系数为0.925,各维度Cronbach′s α系数为0.706~0.940;重测信度为0.944,各维度重测信度为0.778~0.948。 结论 中文版代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与问卷信效度良好,可作为我国社区老年慢性病患者家属预立医疗照护计划参与的测评工具。

    Abstract:

    Objective To translate the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers (ACPES-SDM) and test its reliability and validity. Methods The English version of the ACPES-SDM was translated and culturally adjusted to form a Chinese version scale, which was then used to investigate 415 family members of community elderly patients with chronic diseases by convenience sampling, to test its reliability and validity. Results The item-level content validity index of the Chinese version of the ACPES-SDM ranged from 0.830 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.970. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors (the role cognition of surrogate decision-maker, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness), and the cumulative variance contribution rate of which was 83.906%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model fitted well (χ2/df=2.307、CFI=0.949、GFI=0.880、NFI=0.913、IFI=0.949、TLI=0.937、RMSEA=0.078). The total Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.925, and the subscale Cronbach′s α coefficient ranged from 0.706 to 0.940. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.944, and the subscale test-retest reliability ranged from 0.778 to 0.948. Conclusion The Chinese version of the ACPES-SDM has good reliability and validity, which can be used as a tool assessing advance care planning engagement for family members of community elderly patients with chronic diseases in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘雪冰,陈辉,刘东玲,朱婷婷,高乔乔,王子辰,李嘉音,张琼文,张玲利.代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(17):97-100

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-21
  • 最后修改日期:2021-06-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-12