传染病医院与综合医院护理人员职业暴露及管理现况调查
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,主任护师,护理部副主任

通讯作者:

基金项目:

首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院科研基金“智库计划”项目(DTZK201802)


Occupational exposure and post-exposure management of nurses in infectious disease hospitals and general hospitals
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 了解医院护理人员职业暴露现况,比较传染病医院与综合医院的差异性,为针对性干预提供参考。方法 采用自行设计的职业暴露与防护管理调查问卷对全国31个省市自治区306所医院的19 588名护士进行调查。结果标准预防知晓率为93.29%;乙型肝炎暴露后处理掌握率为95.79%,两类医院差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);艾滋病和丙型肝炎职业暴露后正确处理掌握率传染病医院显著高于综合医院(均P<0.01);护士职业暴露发生率为51.86%,暴露部位主要为手(97.75%),暴露原因主要为锐器处理不当(62.61%),上报率为66.00%,综合医院均显著差于传染病医院(均P<0.01);职业暴露后24 h内检测率为84.04%,获得随访与补偿者为87.72%及70.81%,两类医院差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);支付方式多为医保+自费方式;医院有明确职业暴露补偿制度者为33.02%,传染病医院显著优于综合医院(均P<0.01)。结论 护理人员职业暴露发生率高,以锐器伤为主,上报率低;在职业暴露知识掌握、风险评估、支持及保障3个方面尚需提高,综合医院更甚。各级医院管理人员应引起高度重视,应采取针对性措施加以改进,确保护理人员职业安全。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore occupational exposure of nurses and to compare the differences between infectious disease hospitals and general hospitals, so as to provide reference for targeted interventions. Methods A self-designed questionnaire relating occupational exposure and protection management was used to investigate 19,588 nurses of 306 hospitals in 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China. Results Greater than ninety percent (93.29%) of the participants knew standard prevention and 95.79% of them knew how to manage after hepatitis B exposure, showing no significant differences between infectious disease hospitals and general hospitals (P>0.05 for both). The percentages of nurses who could correctly perform prophylaxis after exposure to AIDS and hepatitis C were significantly higher in infectious disease hospitals than those in general hospitals (P<0.01 for both). The prevalence of occupational exposure among nurses was 51.86% with a reporting rate of 66.00%, and occupational exposure commonly occurred on the hand(97.75%) due to inappropriate disposal of needlestick (62.61%), showing significant poor performance in general hospitals compared with infectious disease hospitals(P<0.01 for all). The rate of testing within 24 hours of exposure was 84.04%, and the rate of receiving follow-up and compensation was 87.72% and 70.81% respectively, indicating no significant difference between the two types of hospitals (P>0.05). Payment for testing was medical insurance or self-financed. Nearly one-third of the hospitals (33.02%) had clear compensation mechanism for occupational exposure, with the infectious disease hospitals superior to general hospitals (P<0.01). Conclusion The findings show high prevalence and low reporting of occupational exposure among nursing staff and more exposures to needlestick injuries. Knowledge, risk assessment, support and guarantee should be enhanced, particularly in general hospitals. Managers of all levels of hospitals should pay great attention to and take targeted interventions to ensure nurses′ occupational safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张海霞,张志云,刘晨,万钢,林兆霞.传染病医院与综合医院护理人员职业暴露及管理现况调查[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(4):54-58

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-19
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-16