Dyspnoea-12量表的汉化与信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,主管护师

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Dyspnoea-12
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 汉化Dyspnoea-12量表,验证其对COPD患者的适用性。 方法 对Dyspnoea-12量表进行翻译、回译、语义调适;采用Dyspnoea-12量表修订版、改良英国医学研究协会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)、慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)对120例COPD患者进行调查,行信度及效度分析。 结果 Dyspnoea-12量表中文版为2个维度共12个条目;探索性因子分析2个维度累积方差贡献率为74.460%;与效标mMRC、CAT和HADS得分相关系数为0.328~0.690,均P<0.01;量表总Cronbach′s α为0.938,分半信度为0.796。 结论 Dyspnoea-12量表中文版有较好的信度和效度,可用于我国COPD患者呼吸困难的评估。

    Abstract:

    Objective To translate the Dyspnoea-12 into simplified Chinese, and to test its suitability in assessing patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Translation, back-translation, and cultural adaptation of the Dyspnoea-12 were conducted. Then 120 COPD patients were invited to fill out the Chinese version of the Dyspnoea-12, Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to test the validity and reliability. Results The Chinese version of Dyspnoea-12 consisted of 12 items assessing two dimensions. Two factors were identified through exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 74.460% of the total variance. The correlation coefficients between Dyspnoea-12 and mMRC, CAT and HADS ranged from 0.328 to 0.690 (P<0.01 for all). The Cronbach′s α coefficient for the scale was 0.938 and split-half reliability was 0.796. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Dyspnoea-12 has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate dyspnoea in Chinese COPD patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨国莉,龙露,龙检. Dyspnoea-12量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(19):35-37+51

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-06