我国医疗机构分娩镇痛现状调查研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士在读,学生

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Investigation on the current situation of labor analgesia in Chinese medical institutions
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 了解我国医疗机构分娩镇痛现状,为今后助产士培训及相关政策制定提供参考。方法 采用横断面调查法对22个省/直辖市/自治区的1 256所医疗机构分娩镇痛现状进行调查。结果 1 256所医疗机构, 具备药物镇痛技术976所(77.7%),具备非药物镇痛技术1 243所(99.0%)。非药物镇痛措施以心理支持(1 092所,82.8%),自由体位(907所,73.0%),拉玛泽呼吸法(887所,71.4%)为主。三级医院具备药物镇痛及非药物镇痛技术的比例显著高于二级医院;妇幼保健医院及专科医院具备药物镇痛技术的比例显著高于综合医院(均P<0.017);医疗机构中主张硬膜外麻醉者主要为产科医生(653所,68.2%),其次是产妇(579所,60.4%)、麻醉科医生(518所,54.1%)、家属(445所,46.5%)、助产士(436所,45.5%)。我国医疗机构未开展非药物镇痛措施的主要原因是人力资源不足(239所,69.5%)以及助产士未经培训(190所,55.2%)。结论 我国医疗机构对非药物分娩镇痛的作用未足够重视,人力资源不足以及助产士未经相关培训阻碍了非药物镇痛措施的普及和开展,应采取措施针对阻碍因素进行干预以推动非药物镇痛措施的开展。

    Abstract:

    Objective To study the current situation of labor analgesia in Chinese medical institutions, and to provide reference for midwives training and relevant policy making in the future. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted to look into the current situation of labor analgesia in medical institutions in 22 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions. Results A total of 1 256 medical institutions in China were surveyed, of which 976 (77.7%) had the technique of pharmacologic labor analgesia and 1 243 (99.0%) had the technique of non-pharmacological labor analgesia. Non-pharmacologic analgesic measures mainly included psychological support (1 092, 82.8%), free posture (907, 73.0%) and Lamaze breathing (887, 71.4%). The proportion of tertiary hospitals which had the technique of pharmacologic of labor analgesia was significantly higher than that of secondary hospitals, likewise non-pharmacological labor analgesia(P<0.017 for all). The proportions of maternal hospitals and specialized hospitals which had the technique of pharmacologic of labor analgesia were significantly higher respectively than that of comprehensive hospitals(P<0.017 for both). The advocators for epidural anesthesia in the medical institutions were obstetricians(653 institutions,68.2%), birthing women(579 60.4%),anesthesiologists(518,54.1%), family members, and midwives(190,55.2%). The main reasons for not implementing non-pharmacological analgesic measures in Chinese medical institutions majorly included under staffing (239 institutions,69.5%) and midwives untrained for the measures (190,55.2%). Conclusion The role of non-pharmacological labor analgesia in medical institutions in China has not been paid much attention to. The lack of human resources and the lack of relevant training of midwives hinder the rollout of non-pharmacological analgesia. Measures should be taken to push forwards non-pharmacological analgesia in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王燕,罗碧如,徐鑫芬,姜梅.我国医疗机构分娩镇痛现状调查研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(12):16-19+41

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-05
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-06