临床科室护理风险评估问卷的编制及信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

中华护理学会2017-2018年度科研课题立项项目(ZHKY201703);华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院基金项目(02.03.2017-282)


Development of Nursing Risk Assessment Questionnaire for Clinical Departments:testing of reliability and validity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 编制临床科室护理风险评估问卷并检验其信效度。方法 以集对分析理论为指导,通过文献分析法、小组讨论法及专家咨询法形成问卷初稿,对武汉市某三级甲等医院的349名护士进行问卷调查,测定问卷的信效度。结果 临床科室护理风险评估问卷包含4个维度共52个条目。探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为50.302%;问卷内容效度指数为0.980,各条目内容效度指数为0.850~1.000;总问卷Cronbach′s α系数为0.945,折半信度为0.903,重测信度为0.831。结论 所编制的临床科室护理风险评估问卷具有良好的信效度,可用于临床科室护理风险现状的评估。

    Abstract:

    Objective To develop a Nursing Risk Assessment Questionnaire for Clinical Departments, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Guided by set pair analysis theory, a preliminary questionnaire was formulated through literature review, group discussion and expert consultation. Then a total of 349 nurses in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan were selected for investigation to examine the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Results The Nursing Risk Assessment Questionnaire for Clinical Departments consisted of 4 dimensions and 52 items.Exploratory factor analysis identified four principal factors, which explained 50.302% of total variance. The scale-level content validity index was 0.980, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.850 to 1.000. Cronbach′s α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.945, the split half reliability was 0.903, and the test-retest reliability was 0.831. Conclusion The questionnaire enjoys good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate nursing risk in clinical departments.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李鑫,熊莉娟,何嘉,向御婷,肖芳,常晓梅,王玉梅,徐晨子.临床科室护理风险评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(6):49-52

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-19
  • 最后修改日期:2019-12-15
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-31