慢性阻塞性肺疾病国内护理方案与美国护理措施分类比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,助教

通讯作者:

基金项目:

2018年度皖南医学院中青年科研基金项目(WKS201808)


A comparison between COPD nursing care regimens in China and the Nursing Interventions Classification
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 以慢性阻塞性肺疾病为例比较分析中国现有临床护理方案与美国护理措施分类中相关护理方案。方法 采用描述性 研究法,经文献回顾和临床跟踪观察明确国内现有慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床护理内容,形成慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理措施和护理活动 类目;在护理措施分类中初筛并经2轮专家咨询确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的护理措施和活动类目。将中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病 护理方案与美国护理措施分类中关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理方案进行比照。结果 中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病的护理措施和护理活 动与护理措施分类完全匹配、部分匹配、无法匹配的条数分别占27.78%、33.33%、38.89%和25.40%、58.73%、15.87%。结论 护理措施分类术语统一、护理措施和活动分明,但其专科性和在中国的适用性欠缺,国内需要制定统一、标准化、实用性强、符合患 者个体化病情的护理措施系统。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) nursing care regimens in China with the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Methods Nursing interventions and activities regarding COPD in China were identified through literature review and clinical observation, then were mapped to the standards derived from the NIC. The standards were made by employing two-round consultation with expert panel. Results The rate of completely matched, partially matched, and completely unmatched nursing interventions was 27.78%, 33.33%, and 38.89% respectively, and that of nursing activities was 25.40%, 58.73%, and 15.87%, respectively. Conclusion NIC terminology is unified with clear nursing interventions and activities, but its specialty and suitability in China for COPD care have shortcoming. There is an urgent need for a unified, standardized, practical and individualized nursing intervention classification system in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王乐,顾则娟,刘扣英,李远珍,汪苗.慢性阻塞性肺疾病国内护理方案与美国护理措施分类比较[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(22):29-33

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-25
  • 最后修改日期:2019-08-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-09