临床护士批判性思维评估量表的汉化与信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,护师

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Critical Thinking Diagnostic of frontline nurses
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 汉化临床护士批判性思维评估量表,并检验其信效度,为临床护士批判性思维能力测评提供工具。方法 遵循Brislin翻译模型,对临床护士批判性思维评估量表进行翻译、回译及文化调适,形成中文版量表。便利抽取临床护士242人进行调查,评价量表信效度。结果 中文版量表包括问题识别、护理决策、护理优先次序、护理计划、护理计划实施与改进5个维度共16个条目。探索因子分析结果显示,5个公因子的累计方差贡献率为86.472%。总量表Cronbach′s α系数为0.969,折半系数为0.925,重测信度为0.835。结论 中文版临床护士批判性思维评估量表具有良好的信效度,可用于评估临床护士批判性思维能力。

    Abstract:

    Objective To translate the Critical Thinking Diagnostic of frontline nurses (CTDfn) into Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity, aiming to provide a tool for assessing critical thinking ability of clinical nurses.Methods The Chinese version of the CTDfn was developed through translation, back-translation and cultural adaption following the Brislin translation model.Then, a convenience sample of 242 frontline nurses were investigated to test the reliability and validity.Results The Chinese version of the CTDfn included 5 dimensions of problem recognition, clinical decision making, prioritization, development of plan of care, and plan of care implementation and improvement, totaling 16 items.Exploratory factor analysis identified 5 factors, explaining 86.472% of the total variance.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.969, the split-half reliability was 0.925, and the test-retest reliability was 0.835.Conclusion The Chinese version of the CTDfn has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess critical thinking ability of clinical nurses in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张萍,高淳海,瞿茜,吴玉洁,王露,胡婉婷.临床护士批判性思维评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(1):64-67

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-12
  • 最后修改日期:2023-10-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-03